Uniswap has proposed extending the UNIFication burn program to v4 liquidity pools.
Related
TRON oracle WINkLink has officially launched a long-term WIN buyback and burn program, with 100% of actual business revenue being repurchased quarterly.
Mars Finance reports that WINkLink, the core oracle project of the TRON ecosystem, has officially announced the launch of a long-term WIN token buyback program. According to the official announcement, starting from the third quarter of 2026, 100% of the actual business revenue generated by WINkLink's oracle service will be used quarterly to buy back WIN tokens. The repurchased portion will be burned quarterly as planned, and the on-chain burning data will be published in the next quarter to ensure full transparency. This move establishes a value support mechanism for the WIN token driven by real business revenue, enhancing liquidity and market confidence while providing a more solid value anchor for long-term holders.
Robinhood Chain nears $1B TVL as Uniswap drives liquidity: Standard Chartered
Standard Chartered said Robinhood’s Uniswap integration could solve a key challenge for new blockchains while accelerating UNI token burns.
Uniswap initiates v4 protocol fee activation temperature check, introducing a tiered fee controller system.
According to official sources, Uniswap Labs has released a temperature check proposal to enable protocol fees in v4 pools. This proposal follows the fast-track governance process previously approved by UNIFication, directly entering a five-day snapshot vote followed by on-chain voting. Because the v4 Hook architecture makes fee setting more complex than v2/v3, the proposal designs a V4 Fee Controller system containing two core contracts: V4FeePolicy calculates fees for any pool based on governance rules, and V4FeeAdapter is responsible for executing governance coverage and collecting fees to the TokenJar. Fees are calculated hierarchically based on the pool's family: first, the fee rate for a specific trading pair set by governance is checked; second, the default fee rate for that family is checked; and finally, the global default fee rate is checked. This proposal aims to activate fees for three types of pool families across 11 chains, including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and BNB Chain: static fee rate pools without Hooks, CCA pools after continuous liquidation auctions, and aggregator Hook pools. The fee rate for the aggregator Hook pool, after a 25x multiplier adjustment, is 10 bp for non-Base chains (3 bp for stablecoin pairs) and 3 bp for Base chains (1 bp for stablecoin pairs). All fees will flow into the TokenJar of each chain. The UNI burning amount on L2 and Alt-L1 will be bridged across chains to the Ethereum mainnet and sent to the 0xdead address. The Snapshot voting window is from July 7th to 12th, and on-chain voting will begin the week of July 13th. Because GovernorBravo limits each proposal to 10 operations, on-chain voting will be submitted in parallel on two chains to cover all chains.
Uniswap founder Hayden Adams highlights SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce's comment letter supporting autonomous decentralized systems, noting it creates a pathway for compliant trading in permissioned Uniswap v4 pools in the US |source: Twitter
BWENEWS AI: Uniswap founder Hayden Adams highlights SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce's comment letter supporting autonomous decentralized systems, noting it creates a pathway for compliant trading in pe...
GoPlus: Only $14,000 returned; LIT users were arbitrageurized by Backrunner due to routing to low-liquidity pools.
According to Foresight News , security analytics platform GoPlus tweeted regarding the incident where a user exchanged approximately 1,126 ETH (about $2.01 million) for 5,776 LIT (about $14,000) on Uniswap, resulting in a loss of nearly $2 million. GoPlus stated that the core cause of the incident was not a sandwich attack, but rather backrunner arbitrage within the same block. The routing contract dumped a large amount of WETH into a poorly liquid AVAIL/WETH trading pool, causing the user to buy AVAIL at a price significantly deviating from the market price (approximately 120 times the fair value). Subsequently, within the same block, the backrunner reverse-traded the pool with a very small amount of AVAIL at the true price, withdrawing approximately 1,072 WETH and paying the majority (approximately 1,018 ETH) to Titan Builder as a builder payment.
Solana’s fee overhaul increases burn and makes resource hogs pay
Solana’s proposed fee overhaul would make resource-heavy transactions more expensive while cutting costs for simpler activity, and it increases the amount of SOL burned.