币安将为ACX、LSK和STX添加观察标签
Related
SlowMist: The Asterix attack is similar to those of Flooring Protocol and BMP; attackers are looking for common vulnerabilities.
PANews reported on June 9th that Yu Xian, founder of SlowMist, stated that the attack on Asterix was similar to those on Flooring Protocol and BMP yesterday (one using DN404 and the other BT404, both using underlying protocols), involving overflow and reuse of high-level NFT ID shift operations. It seems the attackers were looking for common vulnerabilities. Reportedly, Asterix disclosed an attack yesterday affecting its ASTX token contract, stating that its Uniswap v4 liquidity pool was attacked on June 8th, with attackers stealing approximately 30 ETH through 242 transactions. The vulnerability stemmed from an early version of DN404 lacking checks on token ID restrictions for approved operations. Attackers exploited outdated token approvals, repeatedly selling tokens in the pool to obtain ETH, then using forged IDs to withdraw the same amount of tokens, repeating this cycle until the funds were exhausted.
Binance has completed the integration of the Solv Protocol (SOLV) into its ERC20 network and opened deposit and withdrawal services.
PANews reported on July 8 that Binance has completed the integration of Solv Protocol (SOLV) with the Ethereum (ERC20) network and has opened deposit and withdrawal services.
NEAR Protocol introduces Confidential Intents, enabling developers to integrate confidential execution capabilities.
PANews reported on July 8th that NEAR Protocol announced the launch of Confidential Intents, opening up NEAR's confidential execution infrastructure to all developers. Developers and dApps can provide users with confidential transaction functionality through the NEAR Intents 1Click Swap API. NEAR stated that Confidential Intents uses encryption rather than proof generation, requiring no client-side proof and not increasing wallet complexity; each user's data is individually encrypted rather than pooled obfuscation. Integration only requires adding one parameter, without rebuilding. Over $1.5 billion in ZEC has already been settled through NEAR Intents, and within weeks of its launch, 42% of transaction volume used confidential mode, with daily confidential TVL exceeding $30 million.
Uniswap initiates v4 protocol fee activation temperature check, introducing a tiered fee controller system.
According to official sources, Uniswap Labs has released a temperature check proposal to enable protocol fees in v4 pools. This proposal follows the fast-track governance process previously approved by UNIFication, directly entering a five-day snapshot vote followed by on-chain voting. Because the v4 Hook architecture makes fee setting more complex than v2/v3, the proposal designs a V4 Fee Controller system containing two core contracts: V4FeePolicy calculates fees for any pool based on governance rules, and V4FeeAdapter is responsible for executing governance coverage and collecting fees to the TokenJar. Fees are calculated hierarchically based on the pool's family: first, the fee rate for a specific trading pair set by governance is checked; second, the default fee rate for that family is checked; and finally, the global default fee rate is checked. This proposal aims to activate fees for three types of pool families across 11 chains, including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and BNB Chain: static fee rate pools without Hooks, CCA pools after continuous liquidation auctions, and aggregator Hook pools. The fee rate for the aggregator Hook pool, after a 25x multiplier adjustment, is 10 bp for non-Base chains (3 bp for stablecoin pairs) and 3 bp for Base chains (1 bp for stablecoin pairs). All fees will flow into the TokenJar of each chain. The UNI burning amount on L2 and Alt-L1 will be bridged across chains to the Ethereum mainnet and sent to the 0xdead address. The Snapshot voting window is from July 7th to 12th, and on-chain voting will begin the week of July 13th. Because GovernorBravo limits each proposal to 10 operations, on-chain voting will be submitted in parallel on two chains to cover all chains.
US-listed chip, optical communication, and storage stocks rallied across the board, with CRDO rising over 11% and Western Digital gaining over 9%.
According to BlockBeats data, on July 6th, US chip stocks collectively rallied, with AMD (AMD) up 8.13%, Broadcom (AVGO) up 5.48%, Arm (ARM) up 5.39%, Qualcomm (QCOM) up 5.15%, TSMC (TSM) up 4.81%, Intel (INTC) up 3.79%, and Marvell Technology (MRVL) up 3.70%. Optical communication concept stocks led the gains, with Credo (CRDO) up 11.14%, Astera Labs (ALAB) up 10.08%, Ciena (CIEN) up 4.57%, Coherent (COHR) up 4.53%, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) up 4.19%, and Corning (GLW) up 3.90%. Storage stocks rose across the board, with Western Digital (WDC) up 9.11%, Seagate Technology (STX) up 5.90%, SanDisk (SNDK) up 2.41%, and Micron Technology (MU) up 1.72%.
Dragonfly partner Haseeb: VVV's essence has been misunderstood. Venice is essentially a company, not a decentralized network or on-chain protocol.
On July 5th, PANews reported that Dragonfly partner Haseeb released a video on the X platform stating that Venice is essentially a company, not a decentralized network or on-chain protocol, and the vast majority of its customers are not crypto users. There is a clear misunderstanding in the market regarding its token, VVV: VVV does not represent company equity, nor does it possess attributes similar to "network equity." Even after the airdrop, the company founders invested millions of dollars of their own funds in operations and did not raise funds by selling tokens. Haseeb pointed out that no founder would give up 50% of a company's equity for free in the early stages, and the narrative that equates tokens with equity is logically flawed. He also denied claims of "unclear information," stating that the project team has always clearly defined VVV's positioning.