Silvergate ex-CEO blames Biden pressure for bank’s 2023 wind-down
Related
David Sacks strongly supports Palantir CEO's criticism of AI labs: True enterprise AI security lies in controlling one's own data, models, and computing power.
According to Beating, David Sacks, co-chair of the U.S. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, published an article supporting Palantir CEO Alex Karp's sharp criticism of cutting-edge AI labs, stating that the mainstream media's portrayal of his interview as a "disastrous outburst" precisely demonstrates that Karp hit the nail on the head. Sacks points out that true "AI security" in a corporate environment is not abstract "alignment research" or government-led certification systems, but rather the ability to control one's own data, model weights, and computing power—preventing cutting-edge labs from "absorbing" a company's proprietary knowledge and turning it into the next product. He quotes Karp as saying, "They want to own their means of production, not hand them over to others." Sacks cites the conflict between Figma and Anthropic as a prime example: three days before the release of Claude Design, Anthropic's Chief Product Officer was still a member of Figma's board of directors, and Figma's founder stated that Anthropic "hadn't always been honest with them"; subsequently, Figma's stock price plummeted while Anthropic's valuation soared. He further listed products such as Claude Science, Claude Security, Claude Legal, and Claude Code, pointing out that Anthropic consistently targets vertical sectors originally served by companies that relied on its models, following a consistent pattern: "Observe where value is created first, then jump in." Sacks believes that the perception of open-source models as "dangerous" is not true for companies—retaining choice at the model layer and deciding who can use their core strengths is the real bottom line for corporate security. Previously, Palantir partnered with NVIDIA to deploy Nemotron's open AI models in sovereign environments, serving the US government and critical infrastructure customers, helping organizations train and deploy AI locally while maintaining complete control over data and intellectual property. Palanitir CEO Alex Karp recently gave a scathing interview on CNBC's "Squawk Box," criticizing leading AI model companies as "completely wrong" in their approach to selling AI. Karp emphasized that companies are currently dissatisfied with "cutting-edge labs" like OpenAI and Anthropic, believing they only pursue token maximization, wasting companies' time and money while handing over proprietary value and intellectual property. Karp stated that companies are "angry" and will strive to own their own AI production resources rather than relying on third parties. On June 29th, Palantir partnered with Nvidia to deploy Nvidia Nemotron open AI models in a sovereign environment, primarily serving the US government and critical infrastructure.
Palantir CEO Alex Karp vehemently criticizes the large-scale token fee model.
On July 1st, Palantir CEO Alex Karp stated during an appearance on CNBC's "Squawk Box" that the current general attitude towards AI in the business world is one of resistance—buying a bunch of tokens without getting any real value, and instead handing over their intellectual property and data. He criticized the business model of large model vendors charging based on tokens: since tokens are so valuable, why don't they share the profits, instead of charging based on usage?
Palantir CEO: Enterprises are dissatisfied with "cutting-edge labs" like OpenAI and Anthropic, which only pursue token maximization.
According to BlockBeats, on July 2nd, Palantir CEO Alex Karp, in an interview with CNBC's "Squawk Box," strongly criticized leading AI model companies, calling the way AI is sold "completely wrong." Karp emphasized that companies are already dissatisfied with "cutting-edge labs" like OpenAI and Anthropic, believing they only pursue token maximization, wasting companies' time and money while handing over proprietary value and IP. Karp stated that companies are "angry" and will commit to owning their own AI production resources rather than relying on third parties. On June 29th, Palantir partnered with Nvidia to deploy Nvidia Nemotron open AI models in sovereign environments, primarily serving the US government and critical infrastructure customers. The collaborative system reportedly integrates Nvidia AI technology with Palantir's AIP, Foundry, Ontology, and Apollo platforms, helping organizations train, customize, and deploy AI locally while maintaining complete control over data, intellectual property, and models.
Balancer eyes wind-down after restructuring fails to revive revenue
Balancer cut costs and shipped new products after restructuring, but Marcus Hardt says v3 failed to replace legacy revenue as November’s $128 million exploit continued to weigh on adoption.
KAST's terms of service have sparked controversy, with the CEO questioning user asset ownership.
PANews reported on July 7th that Mike Silagadze, founder and CEO of ether.fi, published an article questioning the terms of service of KAST, a stablecoin payment and crypto card platform. The terms explicitly state that when users transfer cryptocurrency or stablecoins to KAST, it is considered a sale of the relevant virtual assets to KAST, and users no longer retain ownership of the assets; the records displayed in the app are only denominated in USD and do not constitute account balances, deposits, or stored value. Furthermore, KAST emphasizes that it is not a bank, and user funds are not protected by deposit insurance. Since both KAST and ether.fi Cash offer stablecoin payment and crypto card services, they are direct competitors.
Opinion: Warsh should publicly resist Trump's pressure on the Federal Reserve and uphold the central bank's independence.
According to Mars Finance, on July 6th, Bloomberg columnist Jonathan Levin published an article stating that US President Trump and his allies are continuously pushing to influence Federal Reserve decisions through personnel changes, including attempting to replace Fed Governor Lisa Cook and interfering in the selection of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta president, in order to expand the influence of White House supporters on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Levin believes that Kevin Warsh, considered a leading candidate for the next Fed chair, should publicly oppose White House interference, support Jerome Powell and Cook to complete their terms, and demand that the White House withdraw from the selection process for regional Fed presidents; otherwise, his future credibility in leading the Fed and his influence within the committee will be weakened. The Fed's independence is key to maintaining stable inflation expectations and the credibility of monetary policy; continued political interference could damage the stability of the US macroeconomy.